Monthly Archive for June, 2010

Joining The Conversation? It’s No Longer A Question.

Having trouble justifying participation in social networks? Know someone who is standing on the brink, but just can’t take the plunge?

Joining the Social Media ConversationI’m pretty sure we all know someone or some company that just can’t see the light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to a social media strategy and it’s impact on growth. I get the hesitation, I’ve seen and experienced first hand the delays and misplays by some companies avoiding joining the conversation (see my last post!), but more importantly, I also can understand why some folks would be bitter about the fact that now companies (or bloggers) are just going to have to suck it up, create and manage their presence in social media spaces. Why is this a fact? Conversations surrounding your brand, your area of expertise, and your audience is already happening online. And if you, companies (or bloggers) don’t join, you will only miss out on a tremendous opportunity that your competition will have already staked a claim in.

For that reason, I did a little research and found a great blog post by Augie Ray of Forrester, titled Seven Things Your Organization Must Do Because Of Social Media. I want to bring you the main points of this post and hopefully give you a quick synopsis of the things you just can’t ignore any longer if you are looking to grow your company, your audience or your readership. So let’s get started.

Ray starts his post by recalling the legacy question that companies post before the advent of social media impact. What once was “what can the Internet do for us” turned into “what can the Internet do to us”. What a great question. Think about that for a second. What is the difference between the two? Well, Ray cites the as being “…the difference between a false sense of security and a necessity for action.” Meaning, the Internet forced companies, business and publishers to have to make a move. Okay, got it; but what does this have to do with social media? Logically, he suggests to change the subject matter from ‘Internet’ to ‘Social Media’, and apply the same calculation. And in my opinion, that makes sense. So what comes next?

Well, he starts by giving two examples of what social media is doing to business and the impact it’s causing. He talks about the outcomes of the PR crises between Nestle vs. Greenpeace, and Dave Carroll vs. United Airlines. The crux of that message is that your customers can and will use social media as a soap box. And this forces you to have to react. These stories and the outcomes are great examples of what to do and what not to do when this happens.

As an aside, I’d definitely suggest reading about both these stories (you can do so in Ray’s post) and plan on touching more specifically on Dave Carroll and his YouTube sensation “United Breaks Guitars”. There are great lessons to be learned in that story.

Because of the fact that social media forces companies to have to do something because of the existence of social media, the wise choice is to be proactive and join the conversation before a crisis occurs. As such, Ray goes on to give seven specific examples of what smart business will do because of Sociall Media. Take a read, and see what you can take away from these suggestions and try to incorporate them into your social strategy, if you haven’t already. Do your friends a favor, pass this around, too.

1. You must be proactive.
“Every enterprise has some issues that are ticking time bombs waiting to explode in social media…You can no longer run and hide from these sorts of issues, but neither do you need to cave to pressures from the minority.  The key is to identify the issues that can explode in the future, engage proactively with a wide range of consumers, educate honestly, listen sincerely, change consumer perception when you can, and change your company when you can’t.“

2. You must improve customer support.
“For too long, companies have viewed customer support as a cost to be managed rather than as a strategic imperative that affects brand perception.  Today, consumer frustration over perceived service snafus can result in millions of negative impressions, and those impressions get more attention and are more believable to consumers than brand-sponsored advertising impressions.  Marketers must view their customer service organizations as a key component in brand-building efforts, and service leaders must prioritize advocacy measurements as equally or more important than cost metrics.”

3. You must listen.
“Consumer expectations around support are shifting rapidly.  Those who are more engaged (and influential) in social media no longer are opting to pick up the phone and wait on hold to receive the support they expect;  instead, they’re voicing concerns and complaints in open channels like Twitter and expecting companies will respond.  And if a brand fails to do so?  The complaints and negative impressions will only pile deeper.  This trend will accelerate as social media adoption continues to grow…Organizations must implement listening and plan for response or they will suffer the consequences that can come from hundreds of consumers telling thousands (or millions) of people that the company’s products don’t work and service is inferior.”

4. You must participate.
“…While it’s never pleasant to be taken off of message and forced to respond to a negative claim, what exactly is the alternative in our more social world?  Damage is being done to your brand whether consumers complain in your Facebook group or they do so across hundreds of Twitter accounts, blogs and YouTube channels.  And which PR fire would you rather fight—the big one happening in your Facebook group where you have a voice and fans or thousands of little PR blazes scattered across social media where your brand’s participation may not be welcome?  Brands cannot gain control of their brand messaging by failing to participate but instead earn the right to shepherd their brands through presence and engagement in consumers’ favored social channels.”

5. You must respond.
“…How can you ignore damaging accusations that accumulate within your own Facebook group?  You can’t; inaction breeds frustration, annoyance and distrust.  Responding doesn’t mean immediately doing whatever complainers want you to do;  instead the secret to social media success is to respond positively, discredit those who are simply wrong, migrate fuming consumers in need of support to private communication channels and engage openly on those issues about which consumers care deeply.”

6. You must move faster.
“…Many of us just got used to “Internet time,” but “social media time” moves even quicker.  In a world where marketers create five-year plans and dedicate months to developing ad campaigns, social media moves in real time.  Marketers who adopt adaptive marketing techniques will create an enormous competitive advantage over those who try to approach social media as ‘business as usual.’”

7. You must realize every employee is a marketer.
“…Your brand messaging will be delivered as much by employee messages in social media as by paid advertisements; marketers must train every employee about his or her vital role in crafting the brand through participation in social media.”

Ray closes of his post by stating that just like the Web changed everything from recruiting to employee relations, Social Media is doing much the same “with consumer adoption continuing and Facebook and Twitter extending their reach with new tools that enable the social web, we are nowhere near the end of the changes social media will bring to the business environment. Social Media will do much for brands, but it is how an organization anticipates and plans for what social media will do to brands that will create competitive advantages in our newly social world.” And this is exactly why it should no longer be a question of joining the social conversation. Join, before social media does something to you, instead of you letting it do something for you.

Considering Joining The Social Media Conversation? Here’s a Little On What NOT To Do.

Easy Tone DebateSo, if you recall from my last post talking about the ongoing saga between athletic gear behemoth Nike versus the new trend in women’s athletic footwear, toning, Nike is doing themselves a clear disservice in their decision to ‘take a stand’ against the growing popularity of these Reebok “Easy Tone” sneakers (as well as Sketcher’s version) and not jump in to an ever growing niche in women’s athletic footwear. And in my opinion, its a clear example of when a company (possibly justifiably) sees risk in a particular movement, refuses to take action with their competition embraces innovation (at least so far) and is failing to tap into a niche with which a very lucrative section of their target demographic is already diving into. Take it one step further, it could be argued that Nike is in fact insulting this very same demographic by stating that consumers who buy toning footwear are “compromising” on certain elements Nike has decided are crucial to the integrity of women’s athletic footwear. And as I concluded in my last post, I cannot help but see parallels to this story in how some companies and businesses still fail to embrace social media as part of their marketing and community engagement strategy.

I take it something like this. I can understand how C-levels or business owners see the risk in engaging in social networks as part of an overall engagement or growth strategy. Heck, the same goes for bloggers who choose to focus their energies only in their blog, and not foster awareness or growth through other social online spaces. There is more often than not always going to be risk in trying exercises that are new, arguably unproven, and resource-exhaustive. But the folly is in the stall tactics or downright refusal to try. I hear so often the story of having to prove the value of integrating social media into a marketing mix, but in my opinion, there are some things you just have to take a shot in the dark at. Plus, you can’t argue with numbers. If the concern is that you simply do not know that your target audience, community, stakeholder group or demographic is participating in social media, just take a peek at this:

Given that the world’s population is currently 6,827,300,000;

LinkedIn has over 10 million registered users.
That’s approximately 1/680th of the world’s population.
Twitter has over 100 million registered accounts.
That’s approximately 1/68th of the world’s population.
Facebook currently has more than 400 million active users.
That’s approximately 1/17th of the world’s population!

Now obviously there are other considerations in these stats and calculations but the very simple point is clear; a portion of your target audience IS online in these social spaces. And if it isn’t where they exist all the time, in the least there is an opportunity for growth should you choose to at least place a presence in these social networks. Don’t be like Nike in this; don’t make up excuses and only see the risk in joining the conversation (or in their case, the risk in offering a certain in-demand product). Don’t fail to take action one way or another by either joining or providing viable reasons for why you’re not joining (in Nike’s case, they chose to instead insult their competition and their potential target market by claiming “toning” products were compromising in the integrity of athletic footwear). And most definitely, when you can see activity from your target market in social networks managed by or shared with your competition…don’t stick your head in the sand! Take action!

I’ll talk more about things you need to consider when joining and managing your social spaces in my next post.

Nike vs. The Toning Trend; A Little Misstep?

Advertising Misstep?I was reading the other day in an article by Advertising Age about how Nike, the unmistakable brand and once untouchable leader in sports apparel and footwear, is now…well…touchable. And interestingly enough, it’s my very own demographic which is the group that Nike is letting slip through their fingers. As I was reading the story, I couldn’t help but draw parallels to the stories of companies who either discredit the value of social media integration, or fail to harness the power of social media in their marketing, PR or crisis management strategies. Strange, I know. But stick with me.

So what’s going on in women’s footwear and how the heck does it have anything to do with social media? First of all, I can remember a few months ago, seeing what I seem to recall a television ad that, for lack of a better description, showed a woman walking around her bedroom in a pair of booty shorts (okay, underwear) and a pair of running shoes. And what caught my and other’s eyes is quite frankly, she had a fantastic rear end. Not to mention the commercial was bright, happy and inspiring and at the very end the call to action was to buy these revolutionary kicks, coined “Easy Tone”, that were built to tone legs and behinds by simply walking in them throughout the day. The end result of regular usage of these sneakers would be that women’s stems and trunks would look something like what that woman’s fabulous features looked like. And of course, they looked perfect. But I just couldn’t help but sit there and marvel at how unbelievably well targeted that ad campaign was! (As such is the plight of those of us working in the marketing and communications fields, we don’t see the ad for the product that’s being targeted, but more the effectiveness of the ad itself). And who put together this remarkable piece of advertising? Reebok.
Reebok? Really? Huh.
And so was the beginning of the end for Nike’s stranglehold on women’s athletic footwear. Why? Well, as I learned in this AdAge article, Nike refuses to dive into this “toning” revolution which interestingly enough isn’t just cornered by Reebok, but by Stetchers as well. Apparently, according to this article, these types of shoes “don’t fit with [Nike's] performance-obsessed brand”. Yikes. Well, I guess I should give the benefit of the doubt because there is a lot to be said about knowing your niche and staying the course, but at first glance this seems like a tremendous opportunity. In any case, here’s Nike’s explanation for not tapping into this market:

“Unlike today’s toning products, we won’t ask the consumer to compromise on stability, flexibility or any other key performance characteristics as they train,” a company spokesman said in a statement.

The spokesman added that the company has a range of new women’s training products set for fall and winter release. And, speaking to investors last month, CEO Mark Parker promised “more compelling presentations at retail” aimed at women, calling the category “a massive opportunity” for the company.

Okay, so they have conceded two things. First, that they have fallen short in their presentations at retail. No kidding, that new Reebok ad quite literally kicked their but whether or not Nike had a product to compete with against Reebok. Second, they recognize “a massive opportunity” with the working woman’s demographic. Again, umm…no kidding? When was the last time there was a memorable product or ad targeted at the career woman demographic since, well, that imaginary campaign put together for the Mel Gibson and Helen Hunt movie, What Women Want? There very well may be campaigns in existence, but truthfully, I can’t remember one. And for someone who’s a self-proclaimed athlete, that’s kind of big. [Scratch that, I just remembered when the Shox came out. But admittedly I don't remember any campaigning, that was more that I and my friends thought they looked cool]. Either way, it seems like this explanation is a bit loaded for my liking “we won’t ask the consumer to compromise…”? So what, are you saying all of those women already giving the product line a try ARE compromising? Ouch. Them’s fighting words.

So what else has Nike conceded in their pseudo-campaign against these “toning”-type footwear? Let’s look at the stats.

The footwear and apparel behemoth’s share of the U.S. women’s footwear market slipped to 29% last month, down from 36.5% in the year-earlier period, according to SportsOneSource. Its sales of women’s footwear, meanwhile, declined by mid-single digits even as the category grew in the teens.

It’s no mystery where they went: Sketchers and Reebok. Skechers tripled its share during the same period, climbing to 16.5% from 5.5%, and Reebok nearly did the same, jumping to 8% from 3.3%. Both of those marketers have invested heavily in the hugely popular segment of toning shoes, which artificially create additional resistance and turn a simple walk into more of a workout. Reebok is at work trying to widen its franchise with additional products including apparel under its Easy Tone brand.

NikeEnlarge
THE SALES RACE: Change in U.S. market share of women’s footwear among leading brands, 2010 vs. 2009.


“The explosion of growth in this space in such a short period of time eclipses nearly everything I have witnessed in the industry over the last 25 years,” said Herbert Hainer, CEO of Reebok parent Adidas. “We are well on track to selling at least 5 million pairs of toning footwear in the U.S. alone this year.”

Okay, I get it. If Nike doesn’t agree with this line of product and it (somehow) violates their mission statement, or core mantra, or whatever else it is that they’re leaning on, then cool. But their problem lies in that you CAN’T deny the fact that if your target market is embracing a particular product (service, whatever) within your area of expertise, then you’d be a fool to not in the least try to provide a product that either would a) help explain why your competition is doing that target market a disservice by offering and marketing their said product or b) act as a viable alternative to the demand that’s been created by they competition in the meantime.
In the very least, you can’t stick your head in the sand with a disclaimer that states that the product that’s being embraced is not good enough for that very same demographic that’s already embracing it. And then…do nothing. That message is way too little, and way too late. Nike knows well enough of the very clearly shift in demand and if they doesn’t make a move soon, they may as well kiss my demographic goodbye because they’ll most certainly be left in this Easy Tone dust. Innovate, or die… and in my opinion what Nike should do is just take a page out of their own book… and JUST DO IT.
So how does this relate to social media? If you haven’t already caught my drift, stick around. I’ll explain in my next post.

Bloggers, are you getting found?

Bloggers getting foundI’ve been doing some more thinking about how retailers and PR professionals engage with bloggers as part of their overall marketing and engagement strategy. We do know that these marketers (or at least the smart ones, anyway) understand that having solid relationships with bloggers is key to helping spread the word about their product or services. We also know that there are various facts about bloggers that they understand and various specific methods that they incorporate into their pitch strategy. We talked about these in one of my last posts.

But the question still remains, how do these marketers, retailers or PR professionals actually go about finding bloggers? Let’s explore.

Again, with the LinkedIn pitch, I’m still amazed at the amazing resource LinkedIn Groups provides. It’s a collective of intelligent and engaging professionals ready to share their expertise with their virtual colleagues. I love it. And again, I just managed to stumble upon an extremely apt discussion surrounding this specific topic!

In a post titled “How To Find Bloggers”, in a PR and Communications LinkedIn group, they discussed not only the importance of building relationships with bloggers because of their valued relationship and understanding of the target audience, but places to go to search them out. So it’s quite clear, if they’re searching for you hear, maybe you should check to see if you’re actually able to be found!

I’ll list a number of these sites below. Ask yourself as you’re reading, if retailers and PR professionals are citing these places as locations they have had success in reaching out and engaging with bloggers, shouldn’t you be there, too?

Plain ol’ Google search
Do a long-tail keyword search for blogs in the niche you’re looking to participate in and engage. Instead of searching “blogs”, search “green living blogs” or “social media blogs” or “blogging blogs”…you get the idea. Keep in mind that the blogs you find raking first are clearly the more popular blogs ergo the more difficult bloggers to engage.

Google Blog Search
This is pretty self-explanatory; it indexes popular blogs, hot queries, recent posts and you can sort by category.

Technorati
Obviously a great, great index of blogs sorted in tons of different categories. Easily searchable. Also what’s great to take a look at here it’s their yearly “State of the Blogosphere” as it’s important to keep tabs on past evolution of the blog world and predictions for trends in the futures.

BlogPulse
This is a very intelligent website that tracks blog popularity as well as real-time views of popular topics that bloggers are writing about. Great depth of information can be found here.

The Best of the Web Blogs
Probably one of the ugliest sites you’ll want to work with, and if you can get past it looking like a stereotypical PPC page, there’s good blog indexing found here. You need to drill into the site a bit to find the juice, but it’s worth the squeeze.

Here are a couple of other tools worth checking out when searching for your fav blogs (or in your case, looking to be found):

LeapFish Blog Search
IceRocket
Trendpedia
BlogScope.net
Twingly Blog Search
BlogCatalog
PostRank

So, bloggers; if marketing professionals and retailers have identified these places as where they’ve searched to find bloggers like you, perhaps you should consider using these tools to search yourselves! If you aren’t indexed in these places, contact the site owners to find out how you can be added to their search results. And hopefully that gets you one step closer to being found by those looking to solicit services from the likes of you! (Oh, and make sure to check if these companies have Twitter accounts, and follow them too :) )

Any others you can think of?

Last week in Social Media, Online Advertising

Social Media and Online Advertising Speeding UpIs it just me, or is time speeding up? I feel like this post keeps creeping up faster and faster each week! “Like sand through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.” Ha. I don’t know what made me think of that, but let’s go with it.

Glad that’s over. Alright so, we’ve got two new CTOs to follow from last week! Facebook appointed it’s first ever CTO this week, Bret Michaels, who was the companies’ former Director of Platform. Another young buck, who to me looks alarmingly like Prince William’s doppelgänger. Not saying he’s evil, he seems like a cool guy with a borderline rockstar name. Let’s see what magic he’s got up his sleeve. Maybe he should take a quick read of Jason Calcanius’ heated letter to the big buck Zuckerberg. (A mass export button in Facebook? GREAT idea.) And not to take the backseat, is Raymie Stata was also promoted to Yahoo!’s CTO seat from an internal position of Chief Architect. He’s got a lot of interesting things to say about the direction of Yahoo properties, I’ll give you a hint…personalization is the key word there. Oh, and had you heard about “LikeJacking”? I hadn’t either. Read about it here.

Twitter was in the news again last week, alongside Google. Looks like they’re testing out a new ad format to boost Twitter followers. Concept is cool, I could see this picking up. But unfortunately, some dirty laundry was aired out as

an ex-employee decided to spill on his reasons for leaving the company. And speaking of Google, there’s some developments going on that have exposed the fact that the Google Street View team was “accidentally” recording WiFi data during it’s journey through some European streets. There’s quite the drama unfolding here, I suggest you give it a look and let me know what you think…”accident” or “predetermined action”?

I thought this was pretty cool and worth mentioning; Yelp has added an automated restaurant reservation service to it’s basket of goodies. It’s called OpenTable, and “any user who is logged in to Yelp will be able to make a reservation without having to leave the site. They won’t need an OpenTable account to take advantage of this new feature, either.” Now I like that!
Oh, and for a little bit of fun, Mashable managed to track down original viral video Star Wars kid phenomenon. That video was from 2002, has it really been eight years? ‘Cause it’s still funny.